<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Will Google &#8220;Friendster&#8221; Facebook?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Anyone remember Friendster? It was an early entrant into the social networking scene. If they had done their work right they SHOULD have been a much bigger player than they are now.</p>
<p>Why aren&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>1. They didn&#8217;t take care of PR and didn&#8217;t take care of bloggers. Hmmm, Facebook is doing exactly the same thing. Several people at the dinner tonight noted that Facebook hasn&#8217;t responded to claims that Facebook&#8217;s employees are spying on data that the public doesn&#8217;t have access to. And that&#8217;s just one PR complaint.<br />
2. They kicked people out that they didn&#8217;t like. Hmmm, Facebook is doing exactly the same thing.<br />
3. They didn&#8217;t respond to new competitors who took away their coolness. Facebook? They are about to meet their biggest competition yet.</p>
<p>Last night I was at a dinner for Hugh Macleod and Oren Michaels. There was talk of an earthquake. No, not the 5.6 one centered near San Jose. The fact that <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/30/details-revealed-google-opensocial-to-be-common-apis-for-building-social-apps/">Google is about to jump into the social networking world</a>. TechCrunch caused the shockwave of the year with that one.</p>
<p>One name that&#8217;s on the Google announcement, Plaxo, tells me that Google is looking to build a &#8220;social graph&#8221; that&#8217;s open and doesn&#8217;t have walls keeping developers from playing. They are looking to &#8220;Friendster&#8221; Facebook.</p>
<p>Add into this last week&#8217;s little &#8220;Vic Gundotra&#8221; dinner and I&#8217;m already seeing a trend: Google is going full bore after influentials, bloggers, and other &#8220;new media&#8221; developers who need a social network as part of their efforts to remain competitive.</p>
<p>Think about it. Nearly every cool Web property lately has a social network. Upcoming.org, Flickr, Yelp, Channel 9, etc. All have their own proprietary social networks.</p>
<p>Look at MySpace and Facebook. Both don&#8217;t solve that problem.</p>
<p>Will Google? And, by helping out Web 2.0 developers and other influentials (Facebook calls them &#8220;whales&#8221;) will Google cut off Facebook&#8217;s PR air supply (which is proving quite lucrative)?</p>
<p>Those are things I&#8217;m going to focus on for the next few days.</p>
<p>Some things we still need answers on:</p>
<p>1. Is this new Google social network really fun to use like Facebook is?<br />
2. Does it beat Facebook&#8217;s aesthetics?<br />
3. Can the social graph be componetized so that I could add a social network to my blog, for instance?<br />
4. Does the development platform beat Facebook&#8217;s? (Can I see which apps my friends have loaded, is the key question).<br />
5. Does it build a really open social graph?<br />
6. If Google does match Facebook&#8217;s utility (really easy: just clone the hell out of it but give the &#8220;whales&#8221; more than 5,000 friends. I&#8217;ve talked with many celebrities and businesses and they say 5,000 simply isn&#8217;t enough which is why many of them are forced to stay on MySpace) do they allow new kinds of social ads?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be an interesting next month getting around to all these companies again and seeing what they plan to do.</p>
]]></html></oembed>