<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s five-year plan to hit Enterprise continues (Cemaphore helps Google&nbsp;out)]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m convinced that Eric Schmidt, Google&#8217;s CEO, has a five-year plan to put Google&#8217;s foot inside the enterprise door.</p>
<p>Enterprise users aren&#8217;t easy to switch over. On the plane to New York I saw a guy using Windows 2000 with an older version of Lotus Notes. I felt sorry for the guy. But his usage is typical of those in many enterprises. CTOs don&#8217;t like to invest in new stuff when the old stuff is working just fine.</p>
<p>So, you try being a Google salesperson and trying to get the CTO to rip out old stuff (er, Microsoft Office and all of Microsoft&#8217;s servers like Sharepoint and Exchange) and switch to your newer stuff (like Google&#8217;s Docs and Spreadsheets, Gmail, and Google Calendar).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going through that move myself and I can tell you it isn&#8217;t easy. And I&#8217;m one guy who can make up my own mind. Imagine the momentum a big company with, say, 100,000 seats has to go through. Next time you&#8217;re at Hertz rental car you can see that momentum in action: they are still using a character-mode app on their front line machines.</p>
<p>But the early adopters have already moved. When I ask audiences what they are using now, I see more and more Google customers.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t think of a situation where the enterprise didn&#8217;t eventually follow the early adopter crowd. It might have taken years, but they do follow eventually.</p>
<p>Today we are seeing new signs of life in Google&#8217;s strategy and the help didn&#8217;t come from within Google itself.</p>
<p>It comes from a small company named <a href="http://www.cemaphore.com/">Cemaphore</a>. They just announced &#8220;<a href="http://www.cemaphore.com/">MailShadow for Google Apps</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>What does it do? It synchronizes email and calendar items between Microsoft Outlook and Exchange and Gmail/Google Calendar.</p>
<p>Sounds really boring, right? Hey, didn&#8217;t Google just ship its own synchronizer?</p>
<p>Yes, and yes.</p>
<p>But Google&#8217;s synchronizer sucks compared to Cemaphore&#8217;s. It&#8217;s slow and buggy. Earlier in the week I got a demo of Cemaphore&#8217;s new offering from Tyrone Pike, Cemaphore&#8217;s CEO and President.</p>
<p>I saw that, thanks to Cemaphore, when I enter a calendar item in Microsoft Outlook it instantly appeared in Google Calendar.</p>
<p>He repeated the demo with reading and sending email from both Exchange and Gmail. Again, synched within seconds.</p>
<p>My own tests with Google&#8217;s sync technology showed that items wouldn&#8217;t sync for hours, and sometimes, never, if you screwed up and loaded two separate synching products like I did.</p>
<p>So, why is this important?</p>
<p>Because it lets Enterprises slowly introduce Google&#8217;s Enterprise products in.</p>
<p>Enterprises will never move wholesale over to Gmail and Google&#8217;s other offerings. Users just don&#8217;t like that kind of change. There would be revolt at work, if CTOs tried to force it. But this way a CTO can let his/her employees use whatever systems they want and still have them synchronized. And there ARE major reasons to move to Gmail: Cost, for one. I also am hearing that Gmail&#8217;s email servers use far less electricity per mail than Exchange&#8217;s do. Environmentalism anyone? You think that&#8217;s not important for CTOs? It sure is. Both are going to be major drivers that will get Google&#8217;s offerings paid attention to.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m hearing rumblings that Google will follow this announcement up with several of its own over the next couple of months.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what CTOs think of this and it&#8217;ll be interesting to see if it does, indeed, take five years for Google to make major inroads into the Enterprise like I think it will.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></html></oembed>