<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Twitter and inadequacy (er, the great friend&nbsp;divide)]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m tracking the new &#8220;friend divide.&#8221; What is it?</p>
<p>Well, compare your experiences on a number of services when you only have one friend vs., say, 500. Look at Upcoming.org. Have only one friend? It really is empty looking and there&#8217;s not much value. Get 500? And you&#8217;ll have tons of events reporting to you that you&#8217;ll care about (you picked your friends carefully, right?) Plus, you&#8217;ll be able to see which events are more popular which may make them more interesting to you.</p>
<p>Look at Flickr? No friends? No photographs that you care about. Add your family and friends? Lots of fun stuff to look at.</p>
<p>Facebook? Same thing. Choose your friends wisely, though. Professional people don&#8217;t poke or ask you to join stupid applications. Get lots of college kids and you might just lose your mind.</p>
<p>Dopplr? No friends? You won&#8217;t have anyone to meet at the airport or take out for a beer.</p>
<p>Pownce? No friends? You won&#8217;t get sent cool music or cool photography.</p>
<p>Twitter? No friends? You will think it&#8217;s a lame service? Follow only me and you&#8217;ll probably go insane. Follow 500, though, and you&#8217;ll probably start to see the value that I see in this service.</p>
<p>The friend divide means that people who have no friends on these services have poor experiences and aren&#8217;t getting any interesting information or apps or photos or music, etc. People who have tons of friends have HUGELY different experiences on these services. I&#8217;ll demonstrate those differences in a video soon.</p>
<p>But that gets me to another point. <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/080414/p1#a080414p1">This weekend Andrew Baron is selling his Twitter account</a>. That&#8217;s a PR ploy. But what&#8217;s interesting is that people assume there&#8217;s value in getting his followers (probably because they assume there&#8217;s some value in spamming those followers with marketing messages). That&#8217;s funny since it&#8217;s so easy to unfollow people.</p>
<p>But there +is+ value in having a great group of people you&#8217;re following. Follow @craignewmark and you&#8217;ll see what Craig is seeing or thinking (he&#8217;s the founder of Craigs&#8217; List). Follow @pierre and you&#8217;ll see what he&#8217;s thinking (he&#8217;s the founder of eBay). Follow HRBlock and you&#8217;ll see what the team at H&amp;R Block is thinking about taxes and such. Follow @newmediajim and you&#8217;ll see what Jim Long, who is a camera guy in the press pool at the White House, is thinking about.</p>
<p>Now, do you start to get it? If you define yourself by who is following you you&#8217;ll always feel inadequate. After all, you can&#8217;t control your followers and any idiot can follow people. But, define yourself by who you are following and you can really build something of high value.</p>
<p>People still aren&#8217;t getting this. They didn&#8217;t get how I was using Twitter and still don&#8217;t. I follow the world&#8217;s best early adopters, business executives, and entrepreneurs. I really don&#8217;t care if I have a single follower. If I defined myself by my followers I&#8217;d always feel inadequate. If I define myself by the people who I follow, well, I follow the smartest, richest, coolest, funniest people in the world. That makes me smarter, richer, cooler, and funnier.</p>
<p>So, how do you define your experience online?</p>
]]></html></oembed>