<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Malstrom's Articles News]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[seanmalstrom]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/author/seanmalstrom/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Correction: Natal does not have&nbsp;rings]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>An emailer corrects me:</p>
<p><em>There&#8217;s no rings to put on the floor with Microsoft&#8217;s thing. You mistook the ugly carpet in the video for an actual peripheral, à la SEGA Activator. The rings were just a pattern on the carpet ;). Not that it makes Project Natal any less ridiculous, but still, you might want to rectify that.</em></p>
<p>You are correct, and I am doing it now. For those of you not familiar, I don&#8217;t go back and &#8216;edit&#8217; previous posts or even articles. I prefer to let the mistakes hang out and do corrections more like this with updates addressing them. News is moving too fast these days to keep re-editing old stories. I want people to see my mistakes when I make them (like if they read something years ago and know it wasn&#8217;t quite right). A flawed author is one you know isn&#8217;t at a marketing company. So the rings were just a horrible carpet. Wonderful. I thought they were markings to show the zones the camera could detect or something. I couldn&#8217;t see the floor at E3 so I thought the Special Marketing Video (amazing how Microsoft spent so much money on an ad for a &#8216;technology demo&#8217;) portrayed the floor accurately.</p>
]]></html></oembed>