<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Malstrom's Articles News]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[seanmalstrom]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/author/seanmalstrom/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[HD transition is not&nbsp;happening]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be behind more and more due to other things occupying my time. But Rob Fahey&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/definition-transition-editorial">column </a>has been up and is about the HD transition not happening. I think this &#8216;HD Revolution&#8217; mistake is really a symptom of a larger problem, of the &#8220;Game Industry&#8221; becoming more and more distant to its customers. Remember, it isn&#8217;t just about HD game consoles. It is consoles that cost $600-$400 as well. How on earth could anyone think people would want a game console that cost that much? I guess they thought people would get it because that console did &#8220;everything&#8221;. But do customers really want that from their game consoles? The sales of the Wii point to no.</p>
<p>When Xbox 360 launched in 2005, Microsoft hailed this generation as the &#8220;HD Generation&#8221;. When interviewed about asking whether he wished Microsoft came up with the idea of the Wii-mote, Bill Gates replied &#8220;No.&#8221; (Interview was done by 1up).</p>
<p>Yet, three to four years later, are we expected to forget all about what Microsoft said when it comes to their latest promises about Natal? Or even Sony&#8217;s promises with the Wand? Prior to the Wii, Nintendo did have the DS phenomenon so there was sound reason to bet on Nintendo prior to Wii&#8217;s launch. Until Sony and Microsoft have some good strategic business victories under their belt, I&#8217;m inclined to bet against them for the near future.</p>
]]></html></oembed>