<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Malstrom's Articles News]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[seanmalstrom]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/author/seanmalstrom/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Email: You mean Ocarina of Time wasn&#8217;t the big E3&nbsp;announcement?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<div id="mailContent">
<div id="message346362920">
<div id="yiv768667983">
<div><em>Hi Mr. Malstrom, sorry to keep bombarding you with emails, especially since you&#8217;re probably swamped right about now.</em></div>
<div><em><br />
I&#8217;ve noticed something since Nintendo&#8217;s press conference. More people are talking about the <em>Ocarina</em> remake on 3DS than they are <em>Skyward Sword</em>. From what I&#8217;ve observed, the general consensus on <em>Skyward</em> is &#8220;it looks like it could be cool,&#8221; whereas even people who never played <em>Ocarina of Time</em> are pretty much soiling their pants at the idea of a 3DS remake. If that&#8217;s not indication that there&#8217;s something wrong with modern <em>Zelda</em>, I don&#8217;t know what is.</em><br />
.<br />
Ocarina of Time is a known value. Skyward Sword is an unknown. All that we know is that they showed off motion plus controls. But that wasn&#8217;t too effective due to the interference.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we have much information to judge Skyward Sword in any way&#8230; yet. The only thing we can see for sure is the art style.</p>
<p>Note how there was no sword last year for Zelda. Yet, a sword is now in the subtitle. We could be wrong about this title and that it is in massive transition. Miyamoto seems to be throwing his whip at Aonuma.</p></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></html></oembed>