<![CDATA[Email: Pachter’s behavior]]>Malstrom,
It’s been obvious for a while that Patcher’s been trying to influence the industry himself. The question I have is: why? Patcher’s an analyst (or supposed to be). He doesn’t have anything to gain from the rise or fall of the industry. The health of the industry won’t affect his bottom line.
What’s his motivation here? Moneyhats? Fame (lol)?
____________________
I do know that Wedbush has a disclaimer on their ‘analysis’ sheets that say they do seek to do business with these third party companies. What that means, I do not know. But I wouldn’t confine Wedbush’s business to just analysis.
.
Perhaps Pachter would love to tell us what that disclaimer means. Let’s get it all out in the open. Let’s audit all the ‘analyst’ companies to make sure things are on the up and up.
]]>