<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Malstrom's Articles News]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[seanmalstrom]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/author/seanmalstrom/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Email: Cisco killing the flip&nbsp;camcorder]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/13/technology/13flip.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/13/technology/13flip.html</a></em></p>
<div><em>What do you think of this in terms of disruption?  Is this simply a company not understanding what made Flip successful or is something more nefarious happening here: are they intentionally trying to remove a consumer friendly product so people are stuck buying upmarket crap?</em></p>
<p>The simplest answer could have been the smartphone doing what the flip camcorder does. Since flip camcorder is an iconic disruption example, I need to get back to you on this. There has to be material out there from the &#8216;disruption authors&#8217; concerning this subject. It&#8217;ll be curious to hear what they have to say.</p>
<p>But the key word from that article to remember is &#8216;speed&#8217;. Flip Camcorder went from &#8216;hot product&#8217; to obsolete&#8217; in record speed. This was much faster than previous disruptive products.</p>
<p>The point is that the world is speeding up. Cycles are moving faster and faster. It is the way how things will be in this New Era.</p>
<p>A decade or two from now, the rise and fall of the Flip Camcorder will be considered &#8216;slow&#8217; because things in the future will be moving way faster than they are today. And that is scary! =)</p></div>
]]></html></oembed>