<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Malstrom's Articles News]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[seanmalstrom]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/author/seanmalstrom/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Email: Wall Street Journal&nbsp;Interview]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><em>If you skip to around the 8:25 mark in this interview with Reggie, you&#8217;ll see a very interesting question&#8230;.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2011/06/17/video-nintendos-president-discusses-stock-drop-new-wiiu/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><em>http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2011/06/17/video-nintendos-president-discusses-stock-drop-new-wiiu/</em></a></p>
<p>Yeah, I saw it when it came out. I forgot to post about it.</p>
<p>Interviewer knows Reggie has espoused Christensen&#8217;s &#8216;disruption&#8217; strategy. So the interviewer lists some of Christensen&#8217;s elements of a disruptive product and asks Reggie to define the Wii U on them. Reggie fudges them all especially the &#8216;cheap price&#8217;.</p>
<p>A disruptive product is a crappy product for crappy customers. Wii fits this very well. Wii U does not.</p>
<p>Investors are seeing through Nintendo&#8217;s bullshit. This is why they are getting out.</p>
<p>A product does not have to be disruptive or even Blue Ocean to be successful. If Nintendo said, &#8220;We&#8217;re not doing those strategies this time,&#8221; that would have been acceptable. Instead, they are not doing the strategies while saying they are. This is making everyone think Nintendo is either completely incompetent (don&#8217;t know what the strategies are), or they are committing fraud. Either way, investors need to get out ASAP.</p>
]]></html></oembed>