<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Malstrom's Articles News]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[seanmalstrom]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/author/seanmalstrom/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[This game does not look like&nbsp;fun]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<!--YouTube Error: bad URL entered-->
<p>There&#8217;s a reason why there is no excitement for Super Mario in 3DLand. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/NintendoWorldReport#p/u/2/xHHUthiqAWM">What idiot designed this game?</a> It looks like a mess. The Tanooki tail is not being used correctly. The NSMB aesthetic was disliked in both NSMB DS and Super Mario Brothers 5 so why is it here? No multiplayer. The gameplay looks slow and lacks the momentum of 2d Mario.</p>
<p>It looks like the game was designed by a moron who said, &#8220;Herp derp! If I mix gameplay and aesthetic aspects of the NSMB DS and Super Mario Brothers 5 game with rampant use of the tanooki tail, people will like this game.&#8221; We don&#8217;t know the designer of this game so we&#8217;ll call him Mr. Herp Derp. What exactly is in this video that Mr. Herp Derp thinks is &#8216;fun&#8217;? What it tells me is that Mr. Herp Derp has no understanding why the 2d Mario games sold.</p>
<p>Why would anyone buy this game? Yes, its a serious question. I&#8217;m not sure what the attraction of this game is supposed to be. At least the Galaxy games gave a sense of adventure in their environments. Everything looks bland. Did EA make this game?</p>
]]></html></oembed>