<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Malstrom's Articles News]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[seanmalstrom]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/author/seanmalstrom/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Email: Debates not&nbsp;fun?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><em>Master Malstrom,</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;People do dinner parties for these boring debates? You’ve got to be</em><br />
<em>kidding me! Dinner parties are supposed to be exciting and fun events.</em><br />
<em>Who wants to watch a presidential debate at one?&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>I don&#8217;t know, I enjoy the debates.  For someone so interested in</em><br />
<em>analyzing politics, I am a little surprised that you don&#8217;t.  On the</em><br />
<em>other hand, I can understand because it is more productive to analyze</em><br />
<em>facts than to analyze bluster.</em></p>
<p><em>I listen to all the speeches.  News is so repetitive, etc., I like to</em><br />
<em>hear what the president has to say.  I always watch debates and state</em><br />
<em>of the union, even if it is not my choice in office.  Here in Chicago,</em><br />
<em>one of my favorite bars screened all the debates.  With TV volume up</em><br />
<em>(which they never do otherwise), serving drinks only during</em><br />
<em>commercials, and discussion afterwards.  We could not go because we</em><br />
<em>have to work weekday mornings and my wife had homework to do, but we</em><br />
<em>wanted to.  We did drink and watch them at home and cheer at lines we</em><br />
<em>liked and talk shit at ones we didn&#8217;t.  It was a good time, believe it</em><br />
<em>or not.</em></p>
<p><em>I enjoy your Kermit Day concept.  Really funny.  And I think your</em><br />
<em>non-partisan tone is to be commended.  I have no idea who you like;</em><br />
<em>and it doesn&#8217;t matter regarding your analysis.  The &#8220;crude talk&#8221; you</em><br />
<em>are getting must be truly bizarre.  You are simply being factual.  I</em><br />
<em>do hope you will turn out to be wrong but you are just saying how</em><br />
<em>things are.  People who get angry at truth are&#8230;well, I guess this is</em><br />
<em>the point of Kermit Day.  I agree with you that Obama was the same in</em><br />
<em>this election&#8217;s first debate as he has always been.  (&#8220;14 days until</em><br />
<em>kermit day&#8221;)  I saw him as reserved and respectful, professional and</em><br />
<em>presidential.  Thoughtful.  Maybe not best in a debate when the</em><br />
<em>opponent is aggressive, but still the kind of person I want running</em><br />
<em>the country.  Ds who castigate him for it are not helping their own</em><br />
<em>cause.</em></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see the debates as spontaneous. Everything that is coming out of the candidates&#8217; mouths is so scripted, so exercised. The debates never feel intellectual like, say, the Lincoln and Douglas debates.</p>
<p>I think debates would be fun if they were actual debates. But we live in a TV/Internet Age and everything said feels watered down, as if the public wouldn&#8217;t be able to absorb it unless it was said in kindergarten language.</p>
<p>While you might be in a bar watching the debate and talking about it with others, what I find interesting is <em>watching you</em>. It&#8217;s not the candidates or the campaigns I find interesting. It&#8217;s the <strong>electorate</strong> I find fascinating.</p>
]]></html></oembed>