<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Malstrom's Articles News]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[seanmalstrom]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/author/seanmalstrom/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Email: Nintendo&#8217;s backup&nbsp;plan]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><em>Greeting Master Malstrom.</em></p>
<div id="yui_3_7_2_1_1369731398808_3161"><em> </em></div>
<div id="yui_3_7_2_1_1369731398808_3160"><em>I was recently thinking, given the current state of the game industry&#8230; could Nintendo have made a &#8220;backup plan&#8221; in case the 3DS and Wii U were not successes?</em></div>
<div id="yui_3_7_2_1_1369731398808_3136"><em> </em></div>
<div id="yui_3_7_2_1_1369731398808_3137"><em>I think they could&#8217;ve. Nintendo&#8217;s strength has always been in portables, and since the 3DS isn&#8217;t meeting expectations (though better games are coming for it, including new Pokemon games), they probably aren&#8217;t very happy about that.</em></div>
<div id="yui_3_7_2_1_1369731398808_3138"><em> </em></div>
<div id="yui_3_7_2_1_1369731398808_3139"><em>Could their backup plan be the Game Boy line? A simple, single-screen Game Boy console with good graphics, but 2D games that is cheap and easy to pick up and play&#8230; could they have that saved in case of an emergency? It would certainly create buzz on the name alone.</em></div>
<div id="yui_3_7_2_1_1369731398808_3140"><em> </em></div>
<div id="yui_3_7_2_1_1369731398808_3141"><em>Anyway, just throwing it out there before E3&#8230; just in case.<br />
__________________________________________<br />
</em></div>
<div></div>
<div>No new hardware is coming from Nintendo. You&#8217;ll have to wait until Generation 9 for that.I think Nintendo realized early on something was very wrong with the 3DS and Wii U the first month of sales. With the 3DS, we saw Nintendo become very aggressive with price drops and with games. Nintendo cannot afford to lose their handheld gaming market.The Wii U is another situation. I think Nintendo is willing to let it go &#8216;Gamecube&#8217; and just ride out the generation by focusing on the 3DS. Nintendo can survive with the Gamecube, they can&#8217;t survive without a strong handheld. I expect Nintendo will just make the Wii U into a &#8216;fan service console&#8217; while they work on the 9th Generation console strategy (which I suspect will follow the strategy of the NES/Wii instead of the N64/Gamecube/Wii U).I laugh when someone from the Game Industry says that &#8216;Wii U doesn&#8217;t have the install base to survive.&#8217; EVERYONE is underestimating how bad the economic environment is. Let us say the Xbone comes out and doesn&#8217;t sell too well.</p>
<p>&#8220;See? See? That is because of Xbone&#8217;s stupid policies.&#8221;</p>
<p>I <em>strongly think</em> that the change in economic environment has altered people&#8217;s perceptions&#8230; including the hardcore gamer. No one can afford only paying $60 (or more!) for new games. Well, the typical hardcore gamer cannot afford that. Most people are poorer today than they were in 2008.</p>
<p>If the economic environment was the same pre-2008, the hardcore would love to Xbone. Within time of expected price cuts and build up of the &#8216;dude-bro&#8217; games the hardcore loves, they still will likely jump on the Xbone.</p>
<p>If we had today&#8217;s economic environment, how would the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 be received? How would the Red Ring of Death be received?</p>
<p>The Game Industry thinks the same macro-economic conditions exist today as they always have. The current decline is just the &#8216;Next Gen cycle&#8217; they think. &#8220;You can&#8217;t point to those Nintendo consoles, Malstrom, because they are Nintendo.&#8221; What about Vita? &#8220;No, it is because that is Vita.&#8221; Generation 8 will be fun to watch the Game Industry get smashed on their macro-economic assumptions alone.</p>
</div>
]]></html></oembed>