<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Malstrom's Articles News]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[seanmalstrom]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/author/seanmalstrom/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Netflix on Michael&nbsp;Pachter]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Michael Pachter:</p>
<p><em><a href="http://data.cnbc.com/quotes/NFLX" target="_self">Netflix</a>&#8216;s stock price could plummet nearly $200 per share within the next quarter or two, Wedbush Securities analyst Michael Pachter said Monday.</em></p>
<p><em>From video (paraphrasing): &#8220;Netflix&#8217;s stock may drop this quarter but definitely will during the next.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/100904215">Source</a>: CNBC July 2013</strong></p>
<p><em>&#8220;They own nothing and they&#8217;ve acquired nothing,&#8221; says analyst Michael Pachter of Wedbush Securities who raised his price target on Netflix to $80 from $65 today but kept his &#8220;sell&#8221; rating.</em></p>
<p><em>For the record, Factset data shows Pachter is one of nine analysts who currently rate Netflix a sell, while the remaining 75% analysts rate it either hold or buy and have a median price target of $213.</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/breakout/netflix-owns-nothing-poised-short-term-drop-pachter-153848925.html">Source</a>: Yahoo July 2013</strong></p>
<p><em>I must admit to being a bit lazy. Much to my surprise, Pachter has not been &#8220;wrong&#8221; all along while waiting to be &#8220;right&#8221; on NFLX. I fell into a trap of relying on less-than-informative sources to provide information I should have sought on my own.</em></p>
<p><em>For the record, Pachter did not ask me to write this article. I am doing so because I want to. And because I think the guy deserves a fair shake.* Pachter simply emailed me two of his past reports on NFLX, noting that he has not always had a sell rating on the stock. Really, though, it&#8217;s about more than one analyst. It&#8217;s about an attempt to provide investors with more than drive-by reporting. Some, particularly bulls, argue that I write about NFLX so much because I want to take it down and profit. First of all, I have only been short the stock one time, via puts. And, second of all, I don&#8217;t think I have power to take it down even if I wanted to. Truthfully, I think it&#8217;s an interesting story and, based on the debate here and elsewhere, others feel the same way. There&#8217;s nothing better than being even a small part of an interesting story.</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/269803-reviewing-michael-pachters-coverage-of-netflix">Source</a>: Seeking Alpha writer attempting to defend Pachter. May 2011</strong></p>
<p><em>Wedbush maintains an Underperform rating and $160 price target on Netflix (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/stock_lookup.php?q=NFLX">NFLX</a>) following the recent ISP regulation verdict, which is highlighted <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Guidance/Netflix+%28NFLX%29+Could+Suffer+Following+Strike-Down+of+Proposed+Net-Neutrality+Rule+%28VZ%29+%28T%29/9057193.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Analyst+Comments/Netflix+(NFLX)+Could+Be+Biggest+Loser+Following+Net+Neutrality+Decision+-+Analyst/9057610.html">Source</a>: StreetInsider.com story with headline: &#8220;Netflix Could be Biggest Loser Following Net Netruality Decision- Analyst&#8221; January 15, 2014</strong></p>
<p>Today:</p>
<p>Headline:<strong> Netflix Soars To All Time High After Hours On Small Beat; Unfazed By Net Neutrality</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-01-22/netflix-soars-all-time-high-after-hours-small-beat-generates-5-million-q4-cash-flow">Source</a></p>
]]></html></oembed>