<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[shape+colour]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://shapeandcolour.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://shapeandcolour.wordpress.com/author/shapeandcolour/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[random website friday: word&nbsp;count.]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>The Western culture ranks things constantly. The top 10 this and the ugliest 5 those and the 100 greatest these of all time and the 7 wonders of the world. Quantifying gives us an equal measure to scale things no matter how ephemeral they may be. #1 is the most whatever and everything subsequent is less&#8230; whatever it is. So why not rank language itself?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wordcount.org"><font color="#ff00ff">Word Count</font></a> tracks the 86,800 most frequently used words in the English language and ranks them in order of commonness. Created by the almost frighteningly brilliant <a href="http://www.number27.org/index.html"><font color="#ffcc00">Jonathan Harris</font></a>, it&#8217;s source is the <a href="http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/"><font color="#008080">British National Corpus</font></a>, a collection of 100 million published writing samples from a variety of sources. Word Count includes any word that shows up in the BNC at least twice.</p>
<p><img src="https://shapeandcolour.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/shape.jpg" alt="shape.jpg" />  <img src="https://shapeandcolour.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/colour.jpg" alt="colour.jpg" /></p>
<p>The 5 most popular words (when I wrote this post) were &#8220;the&#8221;, &#8220;of&#8221;, &#8220;and&#8221;, &#8220;to&#8221;, and &#8220;a&#8221;. Nothing shocking there. I&#8217;m pleased to report that &#8220;fuck&#8221; comes in at a healthy #5598. If you&#8217;re interested in the rankings of the first 5 words that came to my head (please don&#8217;t judge) then we&#8217;ve got: &#8220;adore&#8221; at #22,013, &#8220;expunge&#8221; at #58,890, &#8220;ejaculation&#8221; at #54,644, &#8220;phosphorus&#8221; at #20,611 (who knew that many people were talking about phosphorus?) and &#8220;barnacle&#8221; at #50,129.</p>
<p>Disappointingly, this means people are talking more about barnacles than ejaculation. WTF?</p>
<p>Word Count even has it&#8217;s own site where people can submit suspiciously logical groupings of words. Among the interesting social tidbits I found on <a href="http://www.number27.org/projects/wordcount/conspiracy.html"><font color="#00ccff">Word Count Conspiracy</font></a> (part of Harris&#8217; website <a href="http://www.number27.org/index.html"><font color="#ffcc00">Number27</font></a>) were #992-995 &#8220;america ensure oil opportunity&#8221; and #7964-7967 &#8220;homosexual loses papal schooling&#8221;.</p>
<p><img src="https://shapeandcolour.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/american.jpg" alt="american.jpg" />  <img src="https://shapeandcolour.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/homosexual.jpg" alt="homosexual.jpg" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.digg.com"><br />
<img src="https://i0.wp.com/digg.com/img/badges/91x17-digg-button.gif" alt="Digg!" height="17" width="91" /><br />
</a></p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://i0.wp.com/shapeandcolour.wordpress.com/files/2008/01/shape.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[350]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[111]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>