<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[shape+colour]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://shapeandcolour.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://shapeandcolour.wordpress.com/author/shapeandcolour/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[levi&#8217;s goes both&nbsp;ways.]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Rome wasn&#8217;t built in a day. Even though this spot doesn&#8217;t take as brave or inclusive a stance as homo-positive advertising from Ikea or even Guiness, it&#8217;s at least one step closer to the front of the bus.</p>
<p>Last year Levi&#8217;s produced two versions of &#8220;Change&#8221;, one in which the standard male hottie encounters the expected female hottie and another where he bats his freshly denim-clad eyes at&#8230; another dude! One of the things I like about this spot is that instead of creating two separate spots &#8211; one with a more stereotypically &#8220;gay&#8221; looking couple and another with a hetero one &#8211; it uses the exact same footage of the main hero guy and just gives two separate endings. While this is admittedly kind of bisexual and played-out metrosexual, and it could even be argued that this sort of main-streaming dilutes the point of the message, I think it strengthens it. Though clearly not pushing anything as scandalous as leading the two gents to hold hands, at least they look lustily at each other.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the hetero version (which played on mainstream networks):</p>
<span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class="youtube-player" width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/43uI5QL0dXs?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;fs=1&#038;hl=en&#038;autohide=2&#038;wmode=transparent" allowfullscreen="true" style="border:0;" sandbox="allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-presentation"></iframe></span>
<p>And here&#8217;s the homo version (which, disappointingly, only aired on the gay US network Logo):</p>
<span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class="youtube-player" width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/PTP1K3Vu3r8?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;fs=1&#038;hl=en&#038;autohide=2&#038;wmode=transparent" allowfullscreen="true" style="border:0;" sandbox="allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-presentation"></iframe></span>
<p>(Agency: BBH New York)</p>
<p>I would have been really impressed if they&#8217;d had the balls to air this during the Super Bowl or WWF or something, though I&#8217;m hardly shocked that they only played it on the gay channel. I&#8217;m also not naïve enough to think this was done with any real idea of diversity &#8211; savvy companies are beginning to realize that gays and lesbians are affluent, like to buy shit, and are chronically under-marketed to. Any kind of gay advertising by a company this large is a move for dollars first. If by it&#8217;s very existence the ads push forward awareness or advancement of homosexual rights, it&#8217;s just a happy by-product.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.digg.com"><br />
<img src="https://i0.wp.com/digg.com/img/badges/91x17-digg-button.gif" alt="Digg!" height="17" width="91" /><br />
</a></p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://i0.wp.com/digg.com/img/badges/91x17-digg-button.gif?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>