<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Speculative Non-Buddhism]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://speculativenonbuddhism.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Glenn Wallis]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://speculativenonbuddhism.com/author/gwallis1/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Word Blood]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><em>This post has some information and a request for your input.</em></p>
<p><strong>New page</strong>. I have added a page called &#8220;Articles&#8221; on the top bar. Many of the pieces on this blog are really more like essays or articles than blog posts. So, I will package them nicely and create pdf files that you can download and print out. Now, light your pipe, and read at leisure.</p>
<p><strong>New Tagline</strong>. I&#8217;ve changed the blog tagline to &#8220;creative criticism&#8221; to better capture what I am up to here. The basic  idea of creative criticism is summed up by Camelia Elias* at EyeCorner Press, who speaks of &#8220;promoting &#8230; writing with an edge,&#8221; and  encouraging &#8220;works that engage with rigorous thinking, but which are yet informed by a creative style, and irreverent approaches to literature, culture, and philosophy.&#8221; (And, need I add, buddhism?)</p>
<p><strong>e-journal</strong>. Speaking of creative criticism, I am creating a new e-journal with the aim of fostering and disseminating  creative writing that uses buddhist materials. I need your support and input. Here&#8217;s the idea. Then, what you can do.</p>
<p><em>Idea</em>. When people hear the term &#8220;creative writing,&#8221; they typically think of poems and short stories and novels. That&#8217;s not what I mean. I mean <strong>word blood</strong>. I mean injecting vitalizing language into <strong>anemic</strong> <strong>buddhistic discourse</strong>. The main concern of the e-journal is to explore the subject in fresh terms. And that can be done—indeed, is often best done—without (necessarily) following the conventions of &#8220;good&#8221; writing. Unlike its well-behaved brethren—academic books and journals and informed blogs—the e-journal will host writing that is not afraid to hiss and spit.</p>
<p><strong>Creative writing</strong>—word blood—plunges deeply into the well of human being.  Bile of enmity rouses it no less than ecstasy of love.  It says, along with Terence (the second-century Roman playwright): &#8220;I am a human being; nothing human can be alien to me.&#8221; Another goal of the e-journal: broaden the spectrum of permissible emotion in buddhistic discourse.</p>
<p><em>What you can do</em>. During this phase of conception, you can give me your feedback and ideas. What should the e-journal be called? Is it something you&#8217;d like to get involved with? In what capacity? Most importantly, you can begin to submit your writing. Remember, there are no rules. Forget about &#8220;genre.&#8221; Length is immaterial. A paragraph can be as rich as a book.  Better yet, how about a fragment? Something broken? Or a stammer? Make up a critiku (critical haiku) or critiverse. Rewrite a sutta/sutra/tantra. Make one up. Be shamelessly autobiographical. Have the Buddha do stand-up. Let loose the howl of an unshackled x-buddhist/non-buddhist/unbuddhist/anti-buddhist. Unbind, goddamit.</p>
<p>Oh, better yet! <strong>Err</strong>. Be a fool. Make a spectacle of yourself. Dance. Sing. Gurgle. Yowl.</p>
<p>Wondering about topics? Imagine the Great Feast of Knowledge. Escort Buddhism there, if you like. Sit down and allow tradition to converse with whomever you fancy—poetry, culinary arts, philosophy, biology; schizoanalysis, anarchism, punk, death. It really doesn&#8217;t matter, as long as you&#8217;re lost in the conversation. Write it up in whatever form you see fit. It really doesn&#8217;t matter, <strong>as long as it lives, breathes, shits—and</strong> <strong>bleeds</strong>.</p>
<p>Anyone who would like to contribute, please either respond directly as a comment (=preferred, since it&#8217;s shared) or by email:<em> gw@glennwallis.com</em></p>
<ul>
<li>For inspiration and some guidance, I can think of no better words than Camelia Elias&#8217;s interview on <a href="http://biblioklept.org/2011/03/29/biblioklept-interviews-camelia-elias-editor-in-chief-of-eyecorner-press/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Biblioklept</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Painting: Mark Rothko (1903-1970), &#8220;Red-Orange,&#8221; 1968. <a href="http://www.reproduction-gallery.com/oil_painting/details/copy_artist/1074559338/masterpiece/Mark_Rothko/museum_quality/Red_Orange_1968.xhtml" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Source.</a></p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://speculativenonbuddhism.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/mark-rothko-red-orange1.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[244]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[330]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>