<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Speculative Non-Buddhism]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://speculativenonbuddhism.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Glenn Wallis]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://speculativenonbuddhism.com/author/gwallis1/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[non + x, Issue&nbsp;Nine]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Issue Nine of <strong><em>non + x</em> </strong>is up. The contents are:</p>
<ol>
<li>Gone with the Wind of Tarot: John Starr Cooke and the Esoteric Tradition in the West, <em>by Camelia Elias</em></li>
<li>The Truth of Anatman, <em>by Tom Pepper</em></li>
<li>How to Xplode X-buddhism, <em>by Matthias Steingass</em></li>
<li>Thinking as Spiritual Practice, <em>by Patrick Jennings</em></li>
<li>Žižek v. Buddhism: Who&#8217;s the Subject?, <em>by Adrian J. Ivakhiv</em></li>
</ol>
<p><em><strong>non + x</strong> </em>will serve two purposes. Our main goal for the e-journal remains to foster original and creative non-buddhist-oriented critical writing. We will also use it to consolidate some of the writing that is happening in various venues, both web-based and otherwise.</p>
<p>We know a lot of you out there are thinking creatively about the contours of a decimated Buddhism. We&#8217;ve heard many innovative ideas. Some of you have submitted essays. Many exciting and vital lines of exploration have been discussed in comments on ours blogs. We&#8217;d like to encourage you to <em>throw the dice. </em>Take a chance. Stand atop the Katahdin of your thought and, like Thoreau, make &#8220;Contact!, Contact! Contact!&#8221;&#8211;and tell us about it. Or take Deleuze&#8217;s advice and create something currently<em> incomprehensible</em>. Remember, anything from a well-argued essay to a dada poem or a wordless photograph counts. The crucial point is that it contributes to our goal of &#8220;wresting vital potentialities of humans from the artificial forms and static norms that subjugate them,&#8221; as Marjorie Gracieuse puts it. That &#8220;wresting&#8221; is the hard part. That&#8217;s the part you&#8217;ll have to think hard about. If you&#8217;re unsure what that goal entails, exactly, please <em>ask</em>. Remember, too, while we were originally animated by the project of wresting potentialities exclusively from x-buddhist materials, we&#8217;re now interested in any and all contemporary cultural forms.</p>
<p>I came across this call for submissions from a spanking new journal, called <em>Hostis: <em>A Journal of Incivility</em></em>. I will say more about this journal, and its theme of cruelty, shortly. By way of injecting some <span style="color:#f91b23;">wordblood</span> into your deliberations on submitting to <em>non + x, </em>consider this:</p>
<blockquote><p>We are looking for submissions that defend cruelty. In addition to scholarly essays, we are looking for any original work suited to the printed page: directions to dérivés or other lived projects, maps, printed code, how-to instructions, photo-essays, détournements, experimental writing, directions to word-games, illustrations, or mixed-media art. To remain consistent with the journal’s point of view, we seek material whose tone is abrasive, mood is cataclysmic, style should is gritty, and voice is impersonal. (<em>Hostis</em>)</p></blockquote>
<p>A kindred spirit, indeed!</p>
<p>Visit <em><a href="http://www.nonplusx.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">non + x</a></em>.</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://speculativenonbuddhism.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/dada-iron.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[225]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[225]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>