<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Real Science]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[stevengoddard]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/author/stevengoddard/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The &#8220;Environmentalists Paradox&#8221;]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/environmentalistsparadox.jpg"><img loading="lazy" data-attachment-id="589" data-permalink="https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/the-environmentalists-paradox/environmentalistsparadox/" data-orig-file="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/environmentalistsparadox.jpg" data-orig-size="494,327" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;}" data-image-title="EnvironmentalistsParadox" data-image-description="" data-medium-file="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/environmentalistsparadox.jpg?w=300" data-large-file="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/environmentalistsparadox.jpg?w=494" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-589" title="EnvironmentalistsParadox" src="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/environmentalistsparadox.jpg?w=494&#038;h=327" alt="" width="494" height="327" srcset="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/environmentalistsparadox.jpg 494w, https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/environmentalistsparadox.jpg?w=150&amp;h=99 150w, https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/environmentalistsparadox.jpg?w=300&amp;h=199 300w" sizes="(max-width: 494px) 100vw, 494px" /></a></p>
<p>Cartoon from <a href="http://reason.com/blog/show/125951.html">Reason Magazine</a></p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2010/sep/02/environmentalist-paradox-wellbeing-resource-depletion">The Guardian</a> :</p>
<p style="padding-left:30px;"><em>We hear lots of concerned chatter these days – not least, here on this site &#8211; about peak oil, peak water, deforestation, resource depletion and the like, but a popular riposte offered by those doubting such concerns is something commonly referred to as the &#8220;Environmentalist&#8217;s Paradox&#8221;.</em></p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p style="padding-left:30px;"><em>The argument goes thus: <strong>&#8220;Why, despite resource depletion and the degradation of ecosystems, is average human well-being improving globally?&#8221;</strong></em></p>
<p style="padding-left:30px;"><em>People such as Matt Ridley, author of the Rational Optimist, argue that environmentalists are needlessly downbeat about humanity&#8217;s prospects. After all, we are a resourceful, adaptable, highly intelligent species more than capable of riding out any current concerns (if only we would de-shackle ourselves from free-market constraints).</em></p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/environmentalistsparadox.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>