<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Real Science]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[stevengoddard]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/author/stevengoddard/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Why Doesn&#8217;t The US Geological Survey Know The Fundamentals Of&nbsp;Geology?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t climate science peer review involve any actual review?</p>
<p>Nature recently published this ingenious paper claiming a &#8220;<em>sea level rise hotspot</em>&#8221; between Cape Hatteras and Cape Cod.</p>
<p><a href="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-13.jpg"><img loading="lazy" data-attachment-id="48798" data-permalink="https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/07/05/why-doesnt-the-us-geological-survey-know-the-fundamentals-of-geology/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-13/" data-orig-file="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-13.jpg" data-orig-size="956,625" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;}" data-image-title="ScreenHunter_65 Jul. 05 08.13" data-image-description="" data-medium-file="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-13.jpg?w=300" data-large-file="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-13.jpg?w=956" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-48798" title="ScreenHunter_65 Jul. 05 08.13" src="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-13.jpg?w=640&#038;h=418" alt="" width="640" height="418" srcset="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-13.jpg?w=640&amp;h=418 640w, https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-13.jpg?w=150&amp;h=98 150w, https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-13.jpg?w=300&amp;h=196 300w, https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-13.jpg?w=768&amp;h=502 768w, https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-13.jpg 956w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/fig_tab/nclimate1597_F2.html">SLRDs for 60-yr time series at gauge locations across North America. : Hotspot of accelerated sea-level rise on the Atlantic coast of North America : Nature Climate Change : Nature Publishing Group</a></p>
<p>Satellite measurements don&#8217;t show this &#8220;hot spot&#8221; &#8211; only tide gauges, indicating that the land is sinking rather than the ocean rising. The geology of the region is well understood &#8211; glacial rebound from the last ice age is causing the &#8220;hot spot&#8221; to sink at the same rate as the rise measured by tide gauges.</p>
<p><a href="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/pgr_paulson2007_rate_of_lithospheric_uplift_due_to_pgr.png"><img loading="lazy" data-attachment-id="48799" data-permalink="https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/07/05/why-doesnt-the-us-geological-survey-know-the-fundamentals-of-geology/pgr_paulson2007_rate_of_lithospheric_uplift_due_to_pgr/" data-orig-file="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/pgr_paulson2007_rate_of_lithospheric_uplift_due_to_pgr.png" data-orig-size="2200,1700" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;}" data-image-title="PGR_Paulson2007_Rate_of_Lithospheric_Uplift_due_to_PGR" data-image-description="" data-medium-file="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/pgr_paulson2007_rate_of_lithospheric_uplift_due_to_pgr.png?w=300" data-large-file="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/pgr_paulson2007_rate_of_lithospheric_uplift_due_to_pgr.png?w=1024" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-48799" title="PGR_Paulson2007_Rate_of_Lithospheric_Uplift_due_to_PGR" src="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/pgr_paulson2007_rate_of_lithospheric_uplift_due_to_pgr.png?w=640&#038;h=494" alt="" width="640" height="494" srcset="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/pgr_paulson2007_rate_of_lithospheric_uplift_due_to_pgr.png?w=640&amp;h=494 640w, https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/pgr_paulson2007_rate_of_lithospheric_uplift_due_to_pgr.png?w=1280&amp;h=988 1280w, https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/pgr_paulson2007_rate_of_lithospheric_uplift_due_to_pgr.png?w=150&amp;h=116 150w, https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/pgr_paulson2007_rate_of_lithospheric_uplift_due_to_pgr.png?w=300&amp;h=232 300w, https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/pgr_paulson2007_rate_of_lithospheric_uplift_due_to_pgr.png?w=768&amp;h=593 768w, https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/pgr_paulson2007_rate_of_lithospheric_uplift_due_to_pgr.png?w=1024&amp;h=791 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a></p>
<p><a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/74/PGR_Paulson2007_Rate_of_Lithospheric_Uplift_due_to_PGR.png">PGR_Paulson2007_Rate_of_Lithospheric_Uplift_due_to_PGR.png (2200×1700)</a></p>
<p>Besides the fact that they missed the fundamental geological point, their claim of &#8220;accelerated sea level rise&#8221; is also bogus. The tide gauges show no acceleration, just a steady subsidence of the land over the last 160 years. The fastest sea level rise actually occurred during the 1930s.</p>
<p><a href="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-27.jpg"><img loading="lazy" data-attachment-id="48804" data-permalink="https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/07/05/why-doesnt-the-us-geological-survey-know-the-fundamentals-of-geology/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-27/" data-orig-file="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-27.jpg" data-orig-size="743,593" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;}" data-image-title="ScreenHunter_65 Jul. 05 08.27" data-image-description="" data-medium-file="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-27.jpg?w=300" data-large-file="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-27.jpg?w=743" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-48804" title="ScreenHunter_65 Jul. 05 08.27" src="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-27.jpg?w=640&#038;h=510" alt="" width="640" height="510" srcset="https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-27.jpg?w=640&amp;h=510 640w, https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-27.jpg?w=150&amp;h=120 150w, https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-27.jpg?w=300&amp;h=239 300w, https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-27.jpg 743w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/12.php">http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/12.php</a></p>
<p>It took me about 15 seconds of reading the study to recognize the horrific error they had made &#8211; yet the paper managed to get through peer review at the &#8220;prestigious&#8221; Nature Magazine.</p>
<p>h/t to <a href="http://www.climatedepot.com/">Marc Morano</a></p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_65-jul-05-08-13.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>