<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Real Science]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[stevengoddard]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/author/stevengoddard/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[One Good Man]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>One good man can make a difference. Rand Paul has turned around public opinion about Obama&#8217;s plans to murder Americans with impunity.</p>
<blockquote><p>A year ago, as the presidential race was taking shape, The Washington Post&#8217;s pollster asked voters whether they favored the use of drones to kill terrorists or terror suspects if they were &#8220;American citizens living in other countries.&#8221; The net rating at the time was positive: 65 percent for, 26 percent against.</p>
<p>Today, after a month of Rand Paul-driven discussion of drone warfare, Gallup asks basically the same question: Should the U.S. &#8220;use drones to launch airstrikes in other countries against U.S. citizens living abroad who are suspected terrorists?&#8221; The new numbers: 41 percent for, 52 percent against.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/03/25/a_50_point_swing_against_targeted_drone_killings_of_u_s_citizens.html">Drones poll: More people oppose drones killing U.S. citizens.</a></p></blockquote>
<p>The Washington Post said that Paul&#8217;s filibuster was an ineffective political stunt.</p>
]]></html></oembed>