It’s always sad when folks who loudly defend their “reasonability” refuse to answer the simplest & most obvious questions. If you won’t visit the link, then I reproduce the relevant bits here:

“The CIC advocates for the notorious Islamist sponsored anti-free speech UN resolution promoting the ”Prohibition of the public defamation of religion” which is a soft-jihad lawfare effort by the Organization of Islamic States [OIC] to make any criticism of Islam illegal worldwide.”

Then:

“That is, the CIC supports proposed laws to muzzle everybody else everywhere and forever– when it comes to free speech about anything negative having to do with their religion– but Imam Delic & Co. have the brass to go on TV complaining about his infringed free speech due to the cancelled DND event. Interesting, no?
Dear Professor Dr. Dawg: why not stick that in your Hypocrisy Files, and give us some easy boilerplate answer justifying how & why Mr. Delic approves of such an anti-democratic double-standard?”

It can’t be stated more plainly than that. If you dismiss the issue because of your contempt for me, that disproves nothing, but rather indicates that some “progressives” may be prejudiced and unreasonable.

Cheers,

Binks

P.S. Dear KC– Points deducted for name-calling. Bad form. And “there’s” [there is] likes to be seen in public with an apostrophe.