<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[SwittersB &amp; Exploring]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://swittersb.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[SwittersB &#38; Exploring]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://swittersb.com/author/swittersb/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Sandy River Flooding: Land Use vs. The Reg&#8217;s&nbsp;Sloth]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><strong>The substantial flooding on the Sandy River last January rattled many of home owner&#8217;s nerves if that watched their yard crumble away. Now after three quarters of a year, the bureaucracy has squandered the Spring/Summer months for construction efforts. No permits. Your Watch Dog at work. Pathetic. Yes, questions abound about the where/whether homes should be built near rivers. That said, they were built and the ass dragging system of reg&#8217;s (the one that many seem hell bent on tripling in size in all directions) has failed this time around, in my humble estimation, to make some decision, any decision, in a timely manner.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong><a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/clackamascounty/index.ssf/2011/10/sandy_river_homeowners_brace_f.html" target="_blank">OREGON LIVE RE SANDY RIVER REHAB OR LACK OF REHAB</a> </strong></p>
]]></html></oembed>