<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[TBI Rehabilitation]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://tbirehabilitation.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Kostas Pantremenos]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://tbirehabilitation.wordpress.com/author/onganalop/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[[ARTICLE] Relearning functional and symmetric walking after stroke using a wearable device: a feasibility study &#8211; Full&nbsp;Text]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<section lang="en" aria-labelledby="Abs1">
<div id="Abs1-section" class="c-article-section">
<h2 id="Abs1" class="c-article-section__title u-h2 js-section-title js-c-reading-companion-sections-item">Abstract</h2>
<div id="Abs1-content" class="c-article-section__content">
<h3 class="c-article__sub-heading u-h3">Background</h3>
<p>Gait impairment is a common consequence of stroke and typically involves a hemiparetic or asymmetric walking pattern. Asymmetric gait patterns are correlated with decreased gait velocity and efficiency as well as increased susceptibility to serious falls and injuries.</p>
<h3 class="c-article__sub-heading u-h3">Research Question</h3>
<p>This paper presents an innovative device worn on a foot for gait rehabilitation post stroke. The device generates a backward motion to the foot, which is designed to exaggerate the existing step length asymmetry while walking over ground. We hypothesize this motion will decrease gait asymmetry and improve functional walking in individuals with chronic stroke.</p>
<h3 class="c-article__sub-heading u-h3">Methods</h3>
<p>Six participants with chronic stroke, more than one year post stroke, received four weeks of gait training with three sessions per week. Each session included 30 min of walking over ground using the wearable device. Gait symmetry and functional walking were assessed before and after training.</p>
<h3 class="c-article__sub-heading u-h3">Results</h3>
<p>All participants improved step length symmetry, and four participants improved double limb support symmetry. All participants improved on all three functional outcomes (gait velocity, Timed Up and Go Test, and 6-Minute Walk Test), and five participants improved beyond the minimal detectable change or meaningful change in at least one functional outcome.</p>
<h3 class="c-article__sub-heading u-h3">Conclusion</h3>
<p>The results indicate that the presented device may help improve stroke patients’ walking ability and warrant further study. A gait training approach using this new device may enable and expand long-term continuous gait rehabilitation outside the clinic following stroke.</p>
</div>
</div>
</section>
<section aria-labelledby="Sec1">
<div id="Sec1-section" class="c-article-section">
<h2 id="Sec1" class="c-article-section__title u-h2 js-section-title js-c-reading-companion-sections-item">Introduction</h2>
<div id="Sec1-content" class="c-article-section__content">
<p>Each year approximately 800,000 Americans experience a new or recurrent stroke, and an estimated six million are living with gait impairments from a stroke [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e537" title="Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, Lang CE. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016; 47(6):e98–169. 
                    https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000098

                  ." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR1" aria-label="Reference 1">1</a>]. One such disability is a ‘hemiparetic’ gait [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e540" title="Kelly-Hayes M, Beiser A, Kase CS, Scaramucci A, D’Agostino RB, Wolf PA. The influence of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke: the framingham study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003; 12(3):119–26." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR2" aria-label="Reference 2">2</a>], which can be characterized by asymmetries in gait measures such as step length and support times [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e543" title="Brandstater M, de Bruin H, Gowland C, Clark B. Hemiplegic gait: analysis of temporal variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983; 64:583–7." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR3" aria-label="Reference 3">3</a>, <a id="ref-link-section-d106070e546" title="Wall J, Turnbull G. Gait asymmetries in residual hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986; 67:550–3." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR4" aria-label="Reference 4">4</a>]. Hemiparetic gait is correlated with decreased gait velocity [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e549" title="Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke. 1995; 26(6):982–9." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR5" aria-label="Reference 5">5</a>, <a id="ref-link-section-d106070e553" title="Lord SE, McPherson K, McNaughton HK, Rochester L, Weatherall M. Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85(2):234–9." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR6" aria-label="Reference 6">6</a>], reduced walking efficiency [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e556" title="E. Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, Carron G, Higgins J, Mcewen S, Salbach N. Disablement following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 1999; 21(5-6):258–68." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR7" aria-label="Reference 7">7</a>], increased joint and bodily degradation [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e559" title="Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, Carnethon M, Dai S, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Ford E, Furie K, Gillespie C, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern S, Ho PM, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lackland D, Lisabeth L, Marelli A, McDermott MM, Meigs J, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino M, Nichol G, Roger VL, Rosamond W, Sacco R, Sorlie P, Stafford R, Thom T, Wasserthiel-Smoller S, Wong ND, Wylie-Rosett J, on behalf of the American Heart Association Statistics Committee, Subcommittee SS. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics–2010 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010; 121(7):46–215. 
                    https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192667

                  ." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR8" aria-label="Reference 8">8</a>], and increased susceptibility to injuries and falls [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e562" title="van der Kooi E, Schiemanck SK, Nollet F, Kwakkel G, Meijer J-W, van de Port I. Falls are associated with lower self-reported functional status in patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98:2393–8." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR9" aria-label="Reference 9">9</a>, <a id="ref-link-section-d106070e565" title="Ng MM, Hill KD, Batchelor F, Burton E. Factors predicting falls and mobility outcomes in patients with stroke returning home after rehabilitation who are at risk of falling. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98:2433–41." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR10" aria-label="Reference 10">10</a>].</p>
<p>While patients and health providers desire effective gait therapy, few effective long-term remedies have been identified. Treatments of gait commonly rely on traditional rehabilitation approaches, such as the Bobath method [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e571" title="Gelber DA, Josefczyk B, Herrman D, Good DC, Verhulst SJ. Comparison of two therapy approaches in the rehabilitation of the pure motor hemiparetic stroke patient. J Neurol Rehabil. 1995; 9(4):191–6." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR11" aria-label="Reference 11">11</a>, <a id="ref-link-section-d106070e574" title="Eich H, Mach H, Werner C, Hesse S. Aerobic treadmill plus bobath walking training improves walking in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2004; 18(6):640–51." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR12" aria-label="Reference 12">12</a>] and lower limb strength training [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e577" title="Glasser L. Effects of isokinetic training on the rate of movement during ambulation in hemiparetic patients. Phys Ther. 1986; 66(5):673–6." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR13" aria-label="Reference 13">13</a>, <a id="ref-link-section-d106070e580" title="Kim CM, Eng JJ, MacIntyre DL, Dawson AS. Effects of isokinetic strength training on walking in persons with stroke: a double-blind controlled pilot study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001; 10(6):265–73." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR14" aria-label="Reference 14">14</a>], to re-train walking patterns. Unfortunately, results are inconsistent across patient populations with these treatment options, and there are not set devices facilitating these treatments. Some other gait correction methods currently being studied include Constraint Induced Movement Therapy [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e583" title="Ribeiro T, Oliveira D, Ferreira L, Costa M, Lacerda M, Lindquist A. Constraint-induced movement therapy for the paretic lower limb in acute and sub-acute stroke. Austin J Cerebrovasc Dis Stroke. 2014; 1(6):1–6." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR15" aria-label="Reference 15">15</a>, <a id="ref-link-section-d106070e587" title="Gray CK, Culham E. Sit-to-Stand in People with Stroke: Effect of Lower Limb Constraint-Induced Movement Strategies. Stroke Res Treat. 2014; 2014:8. Article ID 683681. 
                    https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/683681

                  ." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR16" aria-label="Reference 16">16</a>], body-weight support [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e590" title="Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Elsner B. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017; 8:CD002840. 
                    https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002840.pub4

                  ." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR17" aria-label="Reference 17">17</a>], robotic [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e593" title="Kao P-C, Srivastava S, Agrawal SK, Scholz JP. Effect of robotic performance-based error-augmentation versus error-reduction training on the gait of healthy individuals. Gait Posture. 2013; 37(1):113–20." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR18" aria-label="Reference 18">18</a>], functional electrical stimulation [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e596" title="Daly JJ, Zimbelman J, Roenigk KL, McCabe JP, Rogers JM, Butler K, Burdsall R, Holcomb JP, Marsolais EB, Ruff RL. Recovery of coordinated gait: randomized controlled stroke trial of functional electrical stimulation (fes) versus no fes, with weight-supported treadmill and over-ground training. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011; 25(7):588–96." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR19" aria-label="Reference 19">19</a>], transcranial magnetic stimulation [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e599" title="Wang R, Wang F, Huang S, Yang Y. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhanced treadmill training effects on gait performance in individuals with chronic stroke: A double-blinded randomized controlled pilot trial. Gait Posture. 2019; 68:382–7." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR20" aria-label="Reference 20">20</a>], and full-body gait exoskeletons [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e602" title="Cheng PY, Lai PY. Comparison of Exoskeleton Robots and End-Effector Robots on Training Methods and Gait Biomechanics In: Lee J, Lee MC, Liu H, Ryu JH, editors. Intelligent Robotics and Applications. ICIRA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer: 2013. p. 258–66." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR21" aria-label="Reference 21">21</a>].</p>
<p>In this paper, we present a novel device (shown in Fig. <a href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#Fig1">1</a>) designed to help individuals post stroke re-learn how to walk with little to no therapeutic infrastructure needed. Unlike many of the existing gait rehabilitation devices, this device is passive, portable, wearable, and does not require any external energy. It functions by moving the nonparetic foot backward while the individual walks over ground [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e611" title="Handz̆ić I, Reed KB. Comparison of the passive dynamics of walking on ground, tied-belt and split-belt treadmills, and via the gait enhancing mobile shoe (GEMS). In: 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). IEEE: 2013. p. 1–6. 
                    https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2013.6650509

                  ." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR22" aria-label="Reference 22">22</a>]. The backward motion of the shoe is generated passively by redirecting the wearer’s downward force during stance phase [<a id="ref-link-section-d106070e614" title="Handzic I, Reed KB. Kinetic shapes: analysis, verification, and applications. J Mech Des. 2014; 136(6):061005. 
                    https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027168

                  ." href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#ref-CR23" aria-label="Reference 23">23</a>]. Since the motion is generated by the wearer’s force, the person is in control, which allows easier adaptation to the motion, but this also causes the speed to vary slightly from person to person. The generated motion is demonstrated in Fig. <a href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x#Fig2">2</a>. A height and weight matched shoe is attached to the paretic foot, but does not generate any motion.</p>
<div style="width: 695px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img src="https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs12984-019-0569-x/MediaObjects/12984_2019_569_Fig1_HTML.png" alt="figure1" width="685" height="424" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo of the rehabilitative shoe that is worn on the nonparetic foot</p></div>
</div>
</div>
</section>
<p>[&#8230;]</p>
<p>Continue &#8212;-&gt; <a href="https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x">Relearning functional and symmetric walking after stroke using a wearable device: a feasibility study | Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | Full Text</a></p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://i0.wp.com/media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs12984-019-0569-x/MediaObjects/12984_2019_569_Fig1_HTML.png?fit=440%2C330&ssl=1]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[439]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[272]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>