<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[TBI Rehabilitation]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://tbirehabilitation.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Kostas Pantremenos]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://tbirehabilitation.wordpress.com/author/onganalop/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[[Abstract] The predictors of proxy- and self-reported quality of life among individuals with acquired brain&nbsp;injury]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Abstract</p>



<h2 id="_i3">Purpose</h2>



<p>Acquired brain injury (ABI) diminishes quality of life (QoL) of affected individuals and their families. Fortunately, new multidimensional instruments such as the&nbsp;<em>calidad de vida en daño cerebral</em>&nbsp;(CAVIDACE) scale are available. However, differences in self- and proxy-reported QoL remain unclear. Therefore, this study examined these differences and identified predictors of QoL among individuals with ABI.</p>



<h2 id="_i4">Materials and methods</h2>



<p>This cross-sectional study comprised 393 adults with ABI (men: 60%;&nbsp;<em>M</em>&nbsp;<sub>age</sub>&nbsp;<em>=</em>&nbsp;54.65,&nbsp;<em>SD =</em>&nbsp;14.51). Self-, family-, and professional-reported QoL were assessed using the CAVIDACE scale. Other personal and social variables were assessed as predictors of QoL.</p>



<h2 id="_i5">Results</h2>



<p>Professionals had the lowest QoL scores (<em>M</em> = 1.88,&nbsp;<em>SD</em> = 0.45), followed by family members (<em>M</em> = 2.02,&nbsp;<em>SD</em> = 0.44) and individuals with ABI (<em>M</em> = 2.10,&nbsp;<em>SD</em> = 0.43). Significant differences were found for almost all QoL domains, finding the highest correlations between family and professional proxy measures (<em>r</em> = 0.63). Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that sociodemographic, clinical, rehabilitation, personal, and social variables were significant predictors of QoL.</p>



<h2 id="_i6">Conclusions</h2>



<p>It is necessary to use both self- and proxy-report measures of QoL. Additionally, the identification of the variables that impact QoL permits us to modify the interventions that are offered to these individuals accordingly.</p>



<ul><li>Implications for rehabilitation</li><li>Acquired brain injury (ABI) causes significant levels of disability and affects several domains of functioning, which in turn can adversely affect quality of life (QoL).</li><li>QoL is a multidimensional construct that is affected by numerous factors: sociodemographic, clinical, personal, social, etc; and also, with aspects related to the rehabilitation they receive after ABI.</li><li>Rehabilitation programs should address the different domains of functioning that have been affected by ABI.</li><li>Based on research findings about the QoL’s predictors, modifications could be made in the rehabilitation process; paying special attention to the depressive- and anosognosia process, as well as the importance of promoting social support, community integration, and resilience.</li></ul>



<p> Source: <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638288.2020.1803426?af=R&#038;utm_source=researcher_app&#038;utm_medium=referral&#038;utm_campaign=RESR_MRKT_Researcher_inbound" rel="nofollow">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638288.2020.1803426?af=R&#038;utm_source=researcher_app&#038;utm_medium=referral&#038;utm_campaign=RESR_MRKT_Researcher_inbound</a></p>
]]></html></oembed>