<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[TBI Rehabilitation]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://tbirehabilitation.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Kostas Pantremenos]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://tbirehabilitation.wordpress.com/author/onganalop/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[[Abstract] Identifiable Patterns of Trait, State, and Experience in Chronic Stroke&nbsp;Recovery]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<h2>Abstract</h2>



<h2>Background</h2>



<p>Considerable evidence indicates that the functional connectome of the healthy human brain is highly stable, analogous to a fingerprint.</p>



<h2>Objective</h2>



<p>We investigated the stability of functional connectivity across tasks and sessions in a cohort of individuals with chronic stroke using a supervised machine learning approach.</p>



<h2>Methods</h2>



<p>Twelve individuals with chronic stroke underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) seven times over 18 weeks. The middle 6 weeks consisted of intensive aphasia therapy. We collected fMRI data during rest and performance of 2 tasks. We calculated functional connectivity metrics for each imaging run, then applied a support vector machine to classify data on the basis of participant, task, and time point (pre- or posttherapy). Permutation testing established statistical significance.</p>



<h2>Results</h2>



<p>Whole brain functional connectivity matrices could be classified at levels significantly greater than chance on the basis of participant (87.1% accuracy;&nbsp;<em>P</em>&nbsp;&lt; .0001), task (68.1% accuracy;&nbsp;<em>P</em>&nbsp;= .002), and time point (72.1% accuracy;&nbsp;<em>P</em>&nbsp;= .015). All significant effects were reproduced using only the contralesional right hemisphere; the left hemisphere revealed significant effects for participant and task, but not time point. Resting state data could also be used to classify task-based data according to subject (66.0%;&nbsp;<em>P</em>&nbsp;&lt; .0001). While the strongest posttherapy changes occurred among regions outside putative language networks, connections with traditional language-associated regions were significantly more positively correlated with behavioral outcome measures, and other regions had more negative correlations and intrahemispheric connections.</p>



<h2>Conclusions</h2>



<p>Findings suggest the profound importance of considering interindividual variability when interpreting mechanisms of recovery in studies of functional connectivity in stroke.<strong> </strong></p>



<p><strong><a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1545968320981953">Source</a></strong></p>
]]></html></oembed>