<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[the commune]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://thecommune.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[internationalcommunist]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://thecommune.wordpress.com/author/internationalcommunist/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[civil service pay dispute &#8211; defeat or&nbsp;victory?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><strong>by Steve Ryan, Wrexham PCS</strong></p>
<p>Public and Commercial Services union members were surprised  at the sudden calling off of the planned strike on 10th November. The  strike was pulled at the very last minute on the Friday before the 10th,  leaving activists frantically trying to contact members. The National Executive Committee claimed  the cancellation was due to a &#8220;major breakthrough&#8221; in the dispute.</p>
<p>Surprise turned to bafflement  and in many areas anger when the &#8220;breakthrough&#8221; turned out to be  a letter from O’Donnell &#8211; head of the civil service &#8211; rather than the  hard cash members were expecting!</p>
<p>The NEC claim the letter is  significant in that it confirms there is no 2% cap in pay negotiations  and allows for efficiency savings to be &#8220;recycled&#8221; into pay. No  other union has been given this concession. NEC were also adamant that  the campaign continues , that there will be further talks and that action  will not be ruled out if the letter proves to be a con.</p>
<p>The early signs are not good.  A close examination of the letter shows that the 2% will only NOT apply  in very special circumstances. No claim settled or imposed for 2008  is to be reopened. It also appear to bind the PCS to tacit acceptance  of the efficiencies. It is unclear where the efficiencies to be released  for pay will come from. NEC claim that reducing use of consultants would  go some way towards this but as pay negotiations are still delegated  many departments will be offering savings made from job losses and office  closures-totally unacceptable for any union let alone a &#8220;left&#8221;  union like PCS.</p>
<p>The first big test was in HMRC,  where there is an unsettled dispute. Straight away the letter failed  as pay offer for 2008 was quietly imposed, without any protest from  the Group executive. Again there are promises of open talks for 2009/10  . Members however cannot pay the bills on promises!</p>
<p>Indeed the HMRC experience  indicates that the campaign may be a defeat. Members expected action  or a significant pay increase &#8211; in the event they have neither. This  has led to further anger with the union.</p>
<p>The key will be whether   the dispute is allowed to wither away. Activists must now pressure the  NEC to ensure that</p>
<p>&gt; There are no further below  inflation settlements -flat rate rises for those who lose by % rises</p>
<p>&gt; That all departments open  the books to members to identify the savings</p>
<p>&gt; No savings from job losses  to be used for pay -instead mount a national campaign against job losses  and actualisation</p>
<p>&gt; End performance related  pay</p>
<p>&gt; Progressions to rate for  the job to be paid separately as elsewhere in the public sector</p>
<p>These demands would need to  be backed up by coordinated and innovative industrial action beyond  the one day strikes &#8211; members&#8217; confidence will also need to be rebuilt.</p>
<p>Politically there also needs  to be an open and frank debate about where the allegedly most left wing  union in the TUC is heading. The preparatory ground for a Rank and File  is already there.</p>
]]></html></oembed>