<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[the commune]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://thecommune.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[commie46]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://thecommune.wordpress.com/author/commie46/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[the workers’ inquiry: what’s the&nbsp;point?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<div class="wpcom-reblog-snapshot"> <div class="reblog-post"><p class="reblog-from"><img alt='' src='https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/300c09ab6c41d6692f9d740b135e11bb?s=32&#038;d=identicon' class='avatar avatar-32' height='32' width='32' /><a href="https://thecommune.wordpress.com/2011/05/16/the-workers%e2%80%99-inquiry-what%e2%80%99s-the-point/">the commune</a></p><div class="reblogged-content">
<p><strong>Joe Thorne looks at the history of the “workers’ inquiry” idea: from Marx, to Italy in the 1960s, to the present day.  This fairly long article touches on debates amongst those influenced by <em>operaismo</em> about how we should relate to the modern workplace.</strong></p>

<p>The point of these notes is: to understand what the term ‘workers’ inquiry means; to argue that it has come to mean at least two different things; to characterise the political objective of these different projects; and to evaluate both the importance of those objectives and how well they are met by the methods in question.  The point is to articulate what place I believe the inquiry ought to have in the ideas and practice of revolutionaries.  It will also say something about research into class composition more generally.</p>
</div><p class="reblog-source"><a href="https://thecommune.wordpress.com/2011/05/16/the-workers%e2%80%99-inquiry-what%e2%80%99s-the-point/">View original post</a> <span class="more-words">7,298 more words</span></p></div></div>]]></html></oembed>