<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[the feminist librarian]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://thefeministlibrarian.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Anna Clutterbuck-Cook]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://thefeministlibrarian.com/author/feministlib/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Home Education in&nbsp;CA]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>In the midst of the midterm crunch, I don&#8217;t have a chance to reflect on this at great length, but I saw via the NPR website this week that a <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88091569">California appellate court recently ruled</a> that home education in the state may be vulnerable to legal challenges:</p>
<blockquote><p>The court ruling that declared some home schooling unconstitutional, Huerta says, seemed to indicate that California regulators&#8217; occasional monitoring of the family&#8217;s home efforts was deemed insufficient to qualify children as being enrolled in a school.</p>
<p>Huerta says the ruling is an unprecedented decision, and one that has prompted an uprising not just among home schoolers but also among privacy advocates. &#8220;This is an issue that&#8217;s going to be taken all the way to the Supreme Court,&#8221; he says. &#8220;It&#8217;s going to open a Pandora&#8217;s box of issues the court may not want to address.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Diane Rehm also did <a href="http://wamu.org/programs/dr/08/03/24.php#19493">an hour on the subject</a> this week, a show that I plan to listen to and report back on when I have a chance.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be interested to see both how this actual legal case develops and how the media covers it.  </p>
<p></span></p>
]]></html></oembed>