<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[the feminist librarian]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://thefeministlibrarian.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Anna Clutterbuck-Cook]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://thefeministlibrarian.com/author/feministlib/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Monstrous Regiment(s) of&nbsp;Women!]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, there&#8217;s <a href="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/784">a new anti-feminist documentary</a> out, <span style="font-style:italic;">The Monstrous Regiment of Women</span>, that &#8212; according to their <a href="http://www.monstrousregiment.com/">own website</a> &#8212; &#8220;goes all out to demolish the feminist worldview . . . from a consistently Christian perspective.&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">*giggle* </span></p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s the fact that I&#8217;m still suffering from a head cold, which seems to leave me prone to the giggles, but I have to say I find this project really amusing.</p>
<p>You see, that particular quotation<span style="font-weight:bold;">*</span> has been used before . . . and to much better effect, at least in my humble opinion.  In the interest of doing my part to maintain The Feminist Worldview (is that the same as having a Feminist Agenda?)  I thought I would take this opportunity to highlight them here.</p>
<p><a href="https://thefeministlibrarian.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/6427d-monstrous_bk2.jpeg"><img src="https://thefeministlibrarian.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/6427d-monstrous_bk2.jpeg?w=120" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5294586723224652162" border="0" /></a>As it happens, just this past weekend Hanna bought me a copy of Terry Prachett&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discworld">discworld</a> novel, <a href="http://www.powells.com/biblio/1-9780060013165-0">Monstrous Regiment</a>, which follows the adventures of the intrepid Polly who, under and assumed masculine identity, has enlisted as a private in a ragtag company of soldiers in order to find her brother Paul who&#8217;s gone missing at the front. I am only about seventy-five pages in, but so far I have enjoyed a great deal of satire, bawdy slapstick comedy, at least one vampire of ambiguous gender, and a very satisfying pub brawl.</p>
<p><a href="https://thefeministlibrarian.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/f440d-monstrous_bk.jpeg"><img src="https://thefeministlibrarian.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/f440d-monstrous_bk.jpeg?w=120" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5294588441961674690" border="0" /></a>A slightly more serious &#8212; though, I would argue, no less lighthearted &#8212; meditation on gender and politics can be found in Laurie R. King&#8217;s second installment of the Mary Russell/Sherlock Holmes series, <a href="http://www.powells.com/biblio/2-9780553574562-1">A Monstrous Regiment of Women</a> (to which I owe the source of the quotation &#8212; King is always scrupulous in her citations!). This chapter of the Russell-Holmes partnership sees Russell coming into her own in 1920s London as an academic and as a sleuth<span style="font-style:italic;"></span> as she tracks down the person or persons responsible for a series of murders all related to the life of a charismatic feminist theologian.</p>
<p><span style="font-size:85%;"><br />*The quotation is taken from the title of a polemic by John Knox (1505-1572), <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=2idJPn85jJUC">The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women</a>, an attack on the regime of Mary Tudor and Mary Stuart in Britain, published in 1558. </span></p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://thefeministlibrarian.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/6427d-monstrous_bk2.jpeg?w=120&fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>