<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[the feminist librarian]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://thefeministlibrarian.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Anna Clutterbuck-Cook]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://thefeministlibrarian.com/author/feministlib/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Hanna blogging: &quot;history is soap&nbsp;opera&quot;]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>My housemate and fellow historian had some fun yesterday with <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/02/david-starkey-henry-viii">this column</a> June Purvis wrote, over at the Guardian, about historian David Starkey&#8217;s recent allegation that women historians have (gasp!) &#8220;feminised history&#8221; to his great and everlasting dismay. As Hanna points out:  </p>
<blockquote><p>honestly, the first thing i thought when i read this &#8212; other than, &#8220;wow, he really is as much of a jerk as he sounds in his books&#8221; which i&#8217;ve never been able to read although i have tried &#8212; was, &#8220;but, mr. starkey sir, history is often a soap opera all on its own. it needs no help from anyone of any gender.&#8221; i mean, seriously.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://karracrow.blogspot.com/2009/04/history-is-soap-opera.html">Read the rest here</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>