<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[the feminist librarian]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://thefeministlibrarian.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Anna Clutterbuck-Cook]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://thefeministlibrarian.com/author/feministlib/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[links: queue clean-up (2nd&nbsp;edition)]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the week after the end of term and I&#8217;ve been collecting links for the past few weeks that somehow never made it live. Therefore, before they go entirely stale (if they haven&#8217;t already), here&#8217;s the short-and-sweet version. </p>
<p>Most recent first: Julia Serano guest-blogs at Feministing on <a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/015254.html">why the up-coming revision of the DSM matters</a>. </p>
<p>via the bog Sex in the Public Square, I found two more astute commentaries on the legal proscription of sexual expression by teens and elders: <a href="http://www.7dvt.com/2009decent-exposure">an op-ed by author Judith Levine</a> (<em>Harmful to Minors</em>)about the media and legal hype surrounding &#8220;sexting&#8221; and a post by Dr. Marty Klein at his blog Sexual Intelligence about <a href="http://sexualintelligence.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/massachusetts-tries-to-be-world’s-sex-crime-capital/">the attempt to make sexual consent of folks over sixty legally impossible in Massachusetts</a>.</p>
<p>JoAnn Wypijewski at <em>The Nation</em> also muses about how the &#8220;sexting&#8221; hysteria <a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090518/wypijewski?rel=hp_picks">says much more about adult interest in quashing teenage expressions of pleasure</a> then it does about legitimate concerns regarding lasting damage to personal reputations.</p>
<p>In other legal news, Dahlia Lithwick returns <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2217431/pagenum/all/#p2">with a tribute to Justice Souter</a> on the occasion of his retirement: &#8220;Justice Souter, a man who may have looked on the surface like he preferred books to people, but in reality, and perhaps unbeknownst even to himself, always put people first.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amanda over at Pandagon writes about the politics of selecting a Supreme Court justice: <a href="http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/and_activist_judge_is_code_for_thinks_women_are_people/">&#8220;And &#8216;activist judge&#8217; is code for &#8216;thinks women are people&#8217; &#8220;</a></p>
<p>In a truly surreal turn of cultural events, AlterNet reports that among some straight men, <a href="http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/138471/note_to_nervous_would-be_dads:_having_kids_doesn't_look_'gay'/">parenting has become the exclusive province of gay folks</a>. </p>
<p>And in other personal-is-political news: Feministing&#8217;s Jessica Valenti <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/apr/24/feminist-wedding-jessica-valenti">on her upcoming marriage and being called a &#8220;ball-cutting cybersuccubus&#8221;</a>.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all I&#8217;ve got for now.  Looking forward to a bit more blog-reading and thoughtful writing in the next few weeks. Once my brain has re-booted itself.</p>
]]></html></oembed>