<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[the feminist librarian]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://thefeministlibrarian.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Anna Clutterbuck-Cook]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://thefeministlibrarian.com/author/feministlib/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[sunday smut: links list on sex and gender (no.&nbsp;4)]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://thefeministlibrarian.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/e151d-kasia_nude.jpg"><img src="https://thefeministlibrarian.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/e151d-kasia_nude.jpg?w=208" border="0" title="A pencil or charcoal sketch of a female nude with her arms above her head. Image titled PICT1897 by Always Rain at Flickr." /></a>News flash: women no longer have &#8220;hymens&#8221; but &#8220;vaginal coronas.&#8221; Why, you may ask? <a href="http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=14092">Ann Bartow @ Feminist Law Professors explains</a>. </p>
<p>While the idea of re-naming the hymen has a certain amount of political merit, I&#8217;d say the same does not hold true for calling the vagina a &#8220;baby-making hole&#8221; (aside from being clunky, it&#8217;s factually inaccurate people!). Check out the sex education book that used this term at beyond birds and bees (via <a href="http://beyondbirdsbees.com/2009/12/16/the-baby-making-hole/">aag</a>, who provides the book illustrations for the visually-inclined).   </p>
<p>Artist Zina Saunders is doing <a href="http://www.drawger.com/zinasaunders/index.php?article_id=9369">a series of portraits of &#8220;long-standing gay couples&#8221;</a> in response to New York state&#8217;s recent failure to pass a gay marriage bill. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m equal parts gleeful and creeped out by this story of the &#8220;ex-gay&#8221; organization Exodus International <a href="http://carnalnation.com/content/41807/898/ex-gay-group-severs-ties-mi-chapter-after-reports-cuddle-therapy">severing ties with a Michigan-based affiliate</a> after allegations of homoerotic abuse. Most puzzling to me is why any group would name itself &#8220;Corduroy Stones&#8221; (outside of the emo rock band context) and what that could possibly have to do with sexual orientation therapy. </p>
<p>Ann at Feministing offers yet another perspective on the abusive relationship dynamics of <em>New Moon</em>, pointing out <a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/019307.html">the normalization of violence in the Native American community depicted in the book and film</a>.</p>
<p>On Wednesday, Jessica, also at Feministing, <a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/019344.html">solicited peoples&#8217; stories about Women&#8217;s and Gender Studies programs</a> in an open comments thread.  </p>
<p>I enjoyed Hanna Rosin&#8217;s book <em>God&#8217;s Harvard</em> which I <a href="http://annajcook.blogspot.com/2007/11/jesus-camp-grows-up.html">reviewed here</a> a couple of years ago. However, sometimes her op-ed pieces cause in me a &#8220;what the fuck?!&#8221; sort of reaction. For example, her recent ruminations on her husband&#8217;s behavior in the kitchen, titled <a href="http://www.doublex.com/section/life/rise-kitchen-bitch">The Rise of the Kitchen Bitch</a>. As my friend Joseph sarcastically commented, &#8220;I <em>so</em> appreciate her writing a piece about men doing more cooking and describing them as bare-fisted, potty mouthed, and (my favorite) testosterone-fueled assholes.&#8221; I mean, really, I could spend paragraphs dissecting harmful class- and gender-based assumptions being made in these two sentences alone: </p>
<blockquote><p>I first heard this term in Sandra Tsing Loh’s recent Atlantic story about her divorce. She used it to describe a friend’s husband who was anal and fussy and altogether too feminine—he belonged to an online fennel club, for God’s sake.</p></blockquote>
<p>While we&#8217;re on the subject of harmful stereotyping, Dr. Marty Klein describes how our cultural terror of online sexual predators effects the ability of consenting adults to role-play sexual fantasies online in &#8220;<a href="http://carnalnation.com/content/41866/98/fantasy-trial-again">Fantasy On Trial (Again)</a>&#8221;  </p>
<p>In an instance of entirely tone-deaf wording, the BBC online forum &#8220;have your say&#8221; published a piece this week it titled &#8220;Should homosexuals face execution?&#8221; (since changed to &#8220;<a href="http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?forumID=7347&amp;edition=1&amp;ttl=20091216203334">Should Uganda debate gay execution?</a>&#8220;) The simple answer to that, boys and girls, is <b>no</b>. The more nuanced answer is <b>fuck no</b>. (via <a href="http://cruellablog.blogspot.com/2009/12/new-bbc-low-and-high.html">Cruella-blog</a>).  Journalists and the public complained, and <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/dec/17/bbc-apologises-homosexuals-executed-headline">the BBC has since apologized</a>.  Hanna and I have been debating between ourselves the effectiveness and legitimacy of the headline; she thinks the first version got the response the BBC wanted, I think the second is more accurate. Either way, it&#8217;s an interesting case-study for how these international issues are framed and reported on by media outlets. </p>
<p>In another instance of media framing, I&#8217;ve been seeing various iterations of this headline the past few days: &#8220;<a href="http://carnalnation.com/content/41806/897/topless-teen-causes-auto-accident">topless teen causes auto accident</a>&#8221; or, as DigitalSpy.uk put it, &#8220;<a href="http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/odd/news/a191689/breast-flashing-teen-hit-by-car.html">breast-flashing teen hit by car</a>.&#8221; A New Zealand teenager who was dared to flash oncoming traffic was fined for supposedly distracting one driver so badly that he veered off the road and <em>ran her down</em>.  Okay: flashing traffic is possibly not the brightest idea going (akin to mooning someone out the window of your car, right?: stupid prank) But I&#8217;m irritated by the way no one is asking why a woman&#8217;s breasts were so distracting to a driver that he hit her with the car &#8212; and if, indeed, that&#8217;s the case, why it&#8217;s somehow her fault and not his. </p>
<p>Lots of folks weighed in on a recent study that concluded young people who engage in casual sexual encounters do not necessarily experience adverse effects. Brandann Hill-Mann @ Women&#8217;s Rights Blog announced &#8220;<a href="http://womensrights.change.org/blog/view/this_just_in_sex_isnt_going_to_destroy_you">this just in: sex isn&#8217;t going to destroy you!</a>&#8220;; Thomas @ Yes Means Yes wrote about &#8220;<a href="http://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/the-absence-of-harm/">the absence of harm</a>&#8220;; Amanda Marcotte, writing @ Double X concludes that &#8220;<a href="http://www.doublex.com/blog/xxfactor/kids-are-downright-boring">the kids are downright boring</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>And finally: speaking of sex, as opening lines go, <a href="http://rkb.tumblr.com/post/283425163/i-lack-sexual-restraint-philosophically-i-dont">Rachel Kramer Bussel definitely takes the cupcake</a> this week with &#8220;I lack sexual restraint. Philosophically, I don’t see the point in it.&#8221;</p>
<p>*Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kasiajaronczyk/2674206453/">PICT1897</a> by Always Rain @ Flickr.</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://thefeministlibrarian.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/e151d-kasia_nude.jpg?w=208&fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>