<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[the feminist librarian]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://thefeministlibrarian.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Anna Clutterbuck-Cook]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://thefeministlibrarian.com/author/feministlib/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[live-blogging &quot;downton abbey&quot; (episode no.&nbsp;4)]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<div class="separator" style="clear:both;text-align:center;"><a href="https://thefeministlibrarian.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/ff1cb-daladieswscroll.png" style="margin-left:1em;margin-right:1em;"><img border="0" height="316" src="https://thefeministlibrarian.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/ff1cb-daladieswscroll.png?w=400&#038;h=316" width="400" /></a></div>
<p>So here we are at the last live-blog for &#8220;Downton Abbey,&#8221; Season One. You can read the snark (you know you want to!) in full over at <a href="http://karracrow.blogspot.com/2011/01/live-blog-fourth-downton-abbey.html">&#8230;fly over me, evil angel&#8230;</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>9.16: [Sybil] A: Someone&#8217;s got something up her sleeve! M: Someone&#8217;s not going to a charity. [Lady and Maggie Smith] M: This is that scene! A: The voice cracks&#8230; [as Maggie Smith rationalizes house geography] H: It&#8217;s the delivery&#8230; M: It&#8217;s fantastic&#8230; A: I could watch that scene over and over for hours. M: She&#8217;s all about practicalities. A: Well, it&#8217;s about image, right? Whatever you do is okay so long as society doesn&#8217;t find out. M: I wonder if Grandma&#8217;s going to back Mary so much now.</p>
<p>9.18: [Anna and Bates, &#8216;I&#8217;m not sure the world is listening.&#8217;] A: Good point. [William and Daisy] A: That&#8217;s&#8230;a stunned look. M: I&#8217;m surprised people can&#8217;t read Daisy like a book!</p></blockquote>
<p>I have to say I&#8217;m sort of &#8230; disappointed in the series as a whole, although invite me back for the visual pleasure any time! And the acting is solid-to-stunning throughout the cast. No; my disappointment comes from what they <i>didn&#8217;t</i> do with the script. At least in this first season. At its heart, &#8220;Downton Abbey&#8221; seems to be really invested in the Edwardian aristocrac, and portraying the intact stratified class system as ultimately a <i>good</i> thing. People within the story flirt with challenging it, but they&#8217;re always won over in the end to this way of life: the lord, the estate, the upstairs/downstairs social organization. None of the women seem to see how to break free of the life-paths they&#8217;ve been set. Very few servants are asking if that&#8217;s the life they want &#8230; and when they do, they&#8217;re inevitably brought back into the fold. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that I expected this film to be about socialist revolutionaries. But given that there <i>were</i> radicals in England at the time &#8212; often asking very trenchant questions about the &#8220;common sense&#8221; assumptions concerning class and gender &#8212; it rings a little false to have those social critiques all but absent in the world of DA. Particularly since it&#8217;s a show that keeps hammering home in the introductions that it&#8217;s all about &#8220;change.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be interested to see what they do with Season 2.</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://thefeministlibrarian.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/ff1cb-daladieswscroll.png?w=300&fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>